At first it was difficult for me to grasp the concept of the text. I clearly understood the woman was succumbing to insanity, and the idea that she may have committed suicide danced in my head, but untill we discussed this in class I was unclear. I appreciated the subtlebness of her death. The reader has to find the evidence and think outside the box to grasp the thought that she committed suicide. I personally love horror movies and how sometimes what you see isn't reality. This was the case with The Yellow Wallpaper. Although death was the ultimate end, we are able to reach further and find underlined themes. Mandy pointed out the domestic struggle of women and the caged feeling of the marital institution.
Oure characters husband is her doctor. Clearly we can find conflict of interest with this situation, "John is a physician, and perhaps--(I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind)--perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster. You see he does not believe I am sick!" (355). John also does not like for her to write. Anyone could understand how frustrating this must be for her. People write to be creative. It serves as an outlet. She has to express herself in private; this is demoralizing and forces her to be submissive.
We also touched on the notion that she may suffer from postpartum depression. This illness is very real and very much a crippling disorder for mothers. The fact that no one empathized or realized what she was suffering from made her situation that much more miserable and that much more a negative affiliation of marriage. Her husband treated her symptoms for a condition she really did not suffer from. All she wanted was the comfort of family and friends and he alienated her which made her depression worse.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Tom Sawyer Prompt
I would like to discuss another attribute equated with boys, "showing off." It seems no matter how good or bad a boy is, he always has to show off in some way shape of form. We noted, in Ragged Dick, Dick, albeit, good natured, still felt the need to show others of his superiority. He needed to prove to others he was the alpha male. So far, in our readings, this is a continuous custome for boys. Tom Sawyer is no acception to the rule, "...then he pretended he did not know she was present, and began to "show off" in all sorts of absurd boyish ways..." (p.23).
The ironic thing about little boys showing off, is we expect it from them. Even if we have no clue of communication amoung boys/men, we still know they do this. It is their way of expression with each other, with women, with coworkers, or with any random person. When Tom meets the new kid and begins a confrontation with him, he is saying--Hey, this is my town. I'm the boss here and you're a threat to me, "If one moved, the other moved-but only sidewise, in a circle; they kept face to face and eye to eye all the time. Finally Tom said: I can lick you!" (p.7)
In fact, when boys become men, they still engage in this manner; it is sort of a special kind of masculine language. Mark Twain does this when he writes, "...namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. If he had been a great and wise philosopher, like the writer of this book, he would now have comprehended...." (p.19). I mean, can you get anymore egotistical then that?!...actually, some can.
Still, though some may view this trait as one of a snob, or meathead, others view it a necessary. Boys, in a societal context, need to be cunning. They need to be one step in front of their competitor. It is they way they survive. Boys, men, are expected to be able to handle themselves out in the "real world." They learn how to do this by showing off when they are young, therefore understanding what they can and cannot get away with later as adults. Girls do this too...it's called flirting!
The ironic thing about little boys showing off, is we expect it from them. Even if we have no clue of communication amoung boys/men, we still know they do this. It is their way of expression with each other, with women, with coworkers, or with any random person. When Tom meets the new kid and begins a confrontation with him, he is saying--Hey, this is my town. I'm the boss here and you're a threat to me, "If one moved, the other moved-but only sidewise, in a circle; they kept face to face and eye to eye all the time. Finally Tom said: I can lick you!" (p.7)
In fact, when boys become men, they still engage in this manner; it is sort of a special kind of masculine language. Mark Twain does this when he writes, "...namely, that in order to make a man or a boy covet a thing, it is only necessary to make the thing difficult to attain. If he had been a great and wise philosopher, like the writer of this book, he would now have comprehended...." (p.19). I mean, can you get anymore egotistical then that?!...actually, some can.
Still, though some may view this trait as one of a snob, or meathead, others view it a necessary. Boys, in a societal context, need to be cunning. They need to be one step in front of their competitor. It is they way they survive. Boys, men, are expected to be able to handle themselves out in the "real world." They learn how to do this by showing off when they are young, therefore understanding what they can and cannot get away with later as adults. Girls do this too...it's called flirting!
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
The Yares of Black Mountain Prompt
I would like to divulge on the idea that the widow and Charley visiting the South is a metaphor for the country as a whole. Ten years after such a tramatic event like the Civil War is not a long time. The country was in a state of reidentifying itself; are we still North vs. South or are a single nation. People had to subcomb to a new idea of the nation. They were beginning to identify themselves as citizens of one great nation instead of two seperate regions.
The widow and Charley represent the new hope for the nation. They represent the idea that American can come together. What was once hatred and termoil, is now opportunity and ambition. The widow sees the South as the chance to embrace something new, "She was tired of New York and New Yorkers, and of the daily grinding them up into newspaper correspondence wherewith to earn her bread. To become an explorer, to adventure into the lairs of bears and wolves, at so cheap a cost as an excursion ticket over the Air-line Railroad..." (p.246).
Davis is telling us whatever perceptions we were subjected to, were now to be thrown out the window. The idea Notherners had of the South would now change, and visa versa. She is telling her readers to open their eyes and explore the great nation we live in. It is yours, embrace it. This is the first reading which is richly discriptive of a country setting, "There were the dark, waving plumes of the American ivy, the red cornucopias of the trumpet-creeper, morning-glories with great white blossoms, the passion-flower trailing its mysterious purple emblems through the mud beneath the oxen's feet,-all creeping or turning in some way toward the river." (p.254).
In no way shape or form is Davis reminding people to embrace the memories of Uncle Tom's Cabin. American's loathed the South after reading this book. She is saying, now, after a great war, embrace the idea of a united America. Forget the stererotypes and explore. Remember your history and learn from it.
The widow and Charley represent the new hope for the nation. They represent the idea that American can come together. What was once hatred and termoil, is now opportunity and ambition. The widow sees the South as the chance to embrace something new, "She was tired of New York and New Yorkers, and of the daily grinding them up into newspaper correspondence wherewith to earn her bread. To become an explorer, to adventure into the lairs of bears and wolves, at so cheap a cost as an excursion ticket over the Air-line Railroad..." (p.246).
Davis is telling us whatever perceptions we were subjected to, were now to be thrown out the window. The idea Notherners had of the South would now change, and visa versa. She is telling her readers to open their eyes and explore the great nation we live in. It is yours, embrace it. This is the first reading which is richly discriptive of a country setting, "There were the dark, waving plumes of the American ivy, the red cornucopias of the trumpet-creeper, morning-glories with great white blossoms, the passion-flower trailing its mysterious purple emblems through the mud beneath the oxen's feet,-all creeping or turning in some way toward the river." (p.254).
In no way shape or form is Davis reminding people to embrace the memories of Uncle Tom's Cabin. American's loathed the South after reading this book. She is saying, now, after a great war, embrace the idea of a united America. Forget the stererotypes and explore. Remember your history and learn from it.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Ragged Dick Prompt
It isn't hard to distinguish characteristics that are opposite between boys and girls. Girls are sugar and spice and everything nice; boys are snakes and snails and puppy-dog tails! We are raised differently. Little girls play with dolls and practice the entrance to their wedding with their best friends; little boys play war and tackle each other. We have expectations from our parents that are different. I was expected to get good grades in school, while my brother was expected to excel in sports.
We can also see these gender seperations in 19th century literature. Ragged Dick is street smart and has a thourogh knowledge of historical landmarks and figures, "At Eight Street Dick turned to the right, and pointed out the Clinton Hall Building now occupied by the Mercantile Library, comprising at that time over fifty thousand volumes." (p. 56). Never before this text have we encountered a character who references important events, places, or people. Ragged Dick wears George Washington's coat and Napoleon's pants. Knowing who these people are tells the readers that boys are expected to be worldly and intelligent.
Excluding Capitola, our characters have been dependant on others for survival. Dick is independant in everyway. He is also hard working and honest which are qualities we want boys to have. These attributes will translate into well-rounded, able bodied men.
Dick- "Made it by shines, in course. My guardian don't allow me no money for theatres, sp I have to earn it."
Porter- "Some boys get it easier than that," said the porter significantly
Dick- " You don't catch me stealin', if that's what you mean," said Dick (p. 10)
These representations of boys have followed into the 21st century. Qualities little boys were required to have, seem to be about the same as today. On the other hand, girls have come a long way. We don't have to be housewives anymore. We can have jobs and earn our own money. Our ultimate goal is no longer marriage; but 21st century men seem to possess the same desires as 19th century men. Their pursuit in life is to be a good provider....but, more involved in family affairs.
We can also see these gender seperations in 19th century literature. Ragged Dick is street smart and has a thourogh knowledge of historical landmarks and figures, "At Eight Street Dick turned to the right, and pointed out the Clinton Hall Building now occupied by the Mercantile Library, comprising at that time over fifty thousand volumes." (p. 56). Never before this text have we encountered a character who references important events, places, or people. Ragged Dick wears George Washington's coat and Napoleon's pants. Knowing who these people are tells the readers that boys are expected to be worldly and intelligent.
Excluding Capitola, our characters have been dependant on others for survival. Dick is independant in everyway. He is also hard working and honest which are qualities we want boys to have. These attributes will translate into well-rounded, able bodied men.
Dick- "Made it by shines, in course. My guardian don't allow me no money for theatres, sp I have to earn it."
Porter- "Some boys get it easier than that," said the porter significantly
Dick- " You don't catch me stealin', if that's what you mean," said Dick (p. 10)
These representations of boys have followed into the 21st century. Qualities little boys were required to have, seem to be about the same as today. On the other hand, girls have come a long way. We don't have to be housewives anymore. We can have jobs and earn our own money. Our ultimate goal is no longer marriage; but 21st century men seem to possess the same desires as 19th century men. Their pursuit in life is to be a good provider....but, more involved in family affairs.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
A Whisper in the Dark Prompt
While reading the second half of the text, my feelings toward Sybil changed. I began to feel sorry for her where before I questioned her integrity. However, I do have to admit, during the first half I was kind of like, "Right on sista. Sock it to em like they do us." I sort of appreciated her feminine powers. I understand that during the 19th century women may have used sensuous games to get what they wanted...some of us still do it now; though at times she was a bit over the top, '"Won't you say yes now, Uncle?" And pleased with the daring of the thing, I put my arm about his neck, kissed him daintly, and perched myself upon his knee with most audacious ease.'" (p. 218).
Also, during the first half of the reading, Sybil comes across as spoiled. She usually gets what she wants, without hesitation from others, "Please tell me, for I've had my own way all my life, and can't bear to be crossed." (p.218).
I was confused as to what was appropriate between the characters, for they were "relatives" and what was not. Our conversation in class about applying aspects of marriage into relationships among relatives completely through me off; but, I knew right away the relationship between Uncle and Sybil was not right.
Upon entering the insane asylum, I was completely thrown off guard. To think you can acctually make someone become insane is scary, "...Dr. Karnac was an unscrupulous ally, for love of gain was as strong as love of science; both were amply gratified, and I, poor victim, was given up to be experimented upon, till by subtle means I was driven to the insanity which would give my uncle full control of my fortune and my fate." (p.246).
We learned in class that the message of this narrative was to scare women into not having sex until they were married. I would think Alcott accomplished her mission. A rich, beautiful, 17 yr old girl ,with no parents, in the hands of a greedy man who claims to be her uncle and flirts with him to get her way; only to wind up in love with her "first cousin" and end up in an insane asylum...I'd be scared into celibacy to...probably even after marriage! If anyone disliked her before this, they certainly felt sorry for her afterwards. She was put through a tremendous ordeal all in the name of greed and obsession, "With trembling hands I dressed, stopping suddenly with a cry; for lifting my hands to my head, I discovered that my hair, my beautiful, abundant hair, was gone!" (p.237).
We learned that mothers, during the 19th century, had a major role in the lives of their children. Mothers taught their little girls all the essentials for becoming a lady. They were the most influential person in the child's life. Sybil, was lacking in this department. Not having a mother may have caused her unruley behavior. Telling her that flirting with a 45 yr old man, who is her uncle, is inappropriate would have had a significant impact on her character. But, surprisingly, Sybil's mother does come into the picture. Come to find out, the person making the noise in the upper room is her mother; really didn't surprise me. Somehow, merachoulously, they always show up....they meaning the people who are suppose to be out of the picture...SURPRISE! Sybil's mother gave her the strength to escape, "...yet hope to breathe a word into your sleepless ear that shall send you back into the world the happy thing you should be. Child! Woman! Whatever you are, leave this accursed house while you have power to do it." (p.244).
Also, during the first half of the reading, Sybil comes across as spoiled. She usually gets what she wants, without hesitation from others, "Please tell me, for I've had my own way all my life, and can't bear to be crossed." (p.218).
I was confused as to what was appropriate between the characters, for they were "relatives" and what was not. Our conversation in class about applying aspects of marriage into relationships among relatives completely through me off; but, I knew right away the relationship between Uncle and Sybil was not right.
Upon entering the insane asylum, I was completely thrown off guard. To think you can acctually make someone become insane is scary, "...Dr. Karnac was an unscrupulous ally, for love of gain was as strong as love of science; both were amply gratified, and I, poor victim, was given up to be experimented upon, till by subtle means I was driven to the insanity which would give my uncle full control of my fortune and my fate." (p.246).
We learned in class that the message of this narrative was to scare women into not having sex until they were married. I would think Alcott accomplished her mission. A rich, beautiful, 17 yr old girl ,with no parents, in the hands of a greedy man who claims to be her uncle and flirts with him to get her way; only to wind up in love with her "first cousin" and end up in an insane asylum...I'd be scared into celibacy to...probably even after marriage! If anyone disliked her before this, they certainly felt sorry for her afterwards. She was put through a tremendous ordeal all in the name of greed and obsession, "With trembling hands I dressed, stopping suddenly with a cry; for lifting my hands to my head, I discovered that my hair, my beautiful, abundant hair, was gone!" (p.237).
We learned that mothers, during the 19th century, had a major role in the lives of their children. Mothers taught their little girls all the essentials for becoming a lady. They were the most influential person in the child's life. Sybil, was lacking in this department. Not having a mother may have caused her unruley behavior. Telling her that flirting with a 45 yr old man, who is her uncle, is inappropriate would have had a significant impact on her character. But, surprisingly, Sybil's mother does come into the picture. Come to find out, the person making the noise in the upper room is her mother; really didn't surprise me. Somehow, merachoulously, they always show up....they meaning the people who are suppose to be out of the picture...SURPRISE! Sybil's mother gave her the strength to escape, "...yet hope to breathe a word into your sleepless ear that shall send you back into the world the happy thing you should be. Child! Woman! Whatever you are, leave this accursed house while you have power to do it." (p.244).
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Hidden Hand Prompt
Okay....so am I the only one who thinks Capitola and Herbert are going to shag? "Herbert Greyson sprang to assist her' but before he reached the spot Cap had pocked herself up, straightened her disordered dress, and now she ran to meet and shake hands with him. There was such a sparkle of joy and glow of affection in the meeting between these two that Old Hurrican, who saw it, suddenly hushed his laugh and grunted to himself." (p.208). It seems so obvious; he taught her to read and right, she grew up so fast on the streets of New York and when she introduced him to Old Hurrican, she was flurting with him. I like the match, but only if they wait a few years...till she's of age!
Also, I want to address the ridiculous notion that Cap was arrested for wearing boys clothing. I understand the idea that gender roles are inherently important to people of the 19th century...but come on! Were they for real? Did people really get arrested for cross dressing? Now-a-days we call it entertainment...trannie shows are awesome!
"What is the matter here?"
"Nothing, your honor, 'cept a boy tuk up for wearing girl's clother, or a girl tuk up for wearing boy's, I dunno which," said the man touching his hat." (p.179)
Oh, then to top it off, Cap may be the rightfull owner of the estate. Remember when Mrs. Condiment...that crakcks me up...Mrs. Condiment...I mean, what, is she wearing a ketchup colored dress...anyhow--remember when she was telling Cap about the Indians and the man, old Henri Le Noir, who killed them. Sounds like that may be Cap's great-grandfather or something.
And on a more serious not...you know how we learned that fathers in these narratives were ment to be absent and provide the means for mothers to teach the children their ways in the world? Well, somehow I believe the authors of the last three novels have though differently. They give us fathers that are not involved and replace them with other men who take on their roles. In a way, they are telling us that a male role model is important and the absence of fathers is not really ok, just tolerated.
Also, I want to address the ridiculous notion that Cap was arrested for wearing boys clothing. I understand the idea that gender roles are inherently important to people of the 19th century...but come on! Were they for real? Did people really get arrested for cross dressing? Now-a-days we call it entertainment...trannie shows are awesome!
"What is the matter here?"
"Nothing, your honor, 'cept a boy tuk up for wearing girl's clother, or a girl tuk up for wearing boy's, I dunno which," said the man touching his hat." (p.179)
Oh, then to top it off, Cap may be the rightfull owner of the estate. Remember when Mrs. Condiment...that crakcks me up...Mrs. Condiment...I mean, what, is she wearing a ketchup colored dress...anyhow--remember when she was telling Cap about the Indians and the man, old Henri Le Noir, who killed them. Sounds like that may be Cap's great-grandfather or something.
And on a more serious not...you know how we learned that fathers in these narratives were ment to be absent and provide the means for mothers to teach the children their ways in the world? Well, somehow I believe the authors of the last three novels have though differently. They give us fathers that are not involved and replace them with other men who take on their roles. In a way, they are telling us that a male role model is important and the absence of fathers is not really ok, just tolerated.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Lamplighter Prompt
To be completely honest, the only connection that I could find among the three girls was the little girl in the video, Anna, seemed indecisive and eager to please like Ellen. Ellen was always trying to please her mother and in doing so, changing her mind constinetely when her opinion differed from her mothers...
" A most beautiful page, indeed; is this your choice Ellen?"
"well, mamma, I don't know; what do you think?"
"I think it is rather inconveniently large and heavy for everyday use. It is quite a weight upon my lap. I shouldn't like to carry it in my hands long. You would want a little table on purpose to hold it."
"Well, that wouldn't do at all," said Ellen, laughing. "I believe you are right, mamma..."
Now if it were Gerty on the show, I think the outcome may have been equal. Both girls aim to please. Neither seems clear about their choices. When asked if she likes the 3rd grade Anna says, "It's not really too hard, but it's not too easy." It's almost as if she wants to stay neutral because she may be afraid of what the adults may think of her answer.
Gerty is the same way. She instictively wants to please True as if it were wired into her little adolescent brain, "O, I wish I could do something for Uncle True!" (p. 31). Again, later in the text, Gerty tries to make True happy by preparing toast. But, in this instance, she forgets about the toast and it burns, "The tears came into Gerty's eyes;- she looked very much disappointed, but said nothing." She wanted so desperately to do something for nice for True--even something as simple as making toast.
I don't feel Gerty is so different from Anna. I think she would have been shy and reserved just as Anna. Most children that age are reserved; testing the waters if you will. Of course Gerty may have shown a bit of a temper if you mention Nan Grant or her kitten. But, other then that, I don't see her as much different from children now. In fact, I'm glad she's fisty. It makes her believable; not make up like Ellen. There are no children now-a-days like Ellen.
" A most beautiful page, indeed; is this your choice Ellen?"
"well, mamma, I don't know; what do you think?"
"I think it is rather inconveniently large and heavy for everyday use. It is quite a weight upon my lap. I shouldn't like to carry it in my hands long. You would want a little table on purpose to hold it."
"Well, that wouldn't do at all," said Ellen, laughing. "I believe you are right, mamma..."
Now if it were Gerty on the show, I think the outcome may have been equal. Both girls aim to please. Neither seems clear about their choices. When asked if she likes the 3rd grade Anna says, "It's not really too hard, but it's not too easy." It's almost as if she wants to stay neutral because she may be afraid of what the adults may think of her answer.
Gerty is the same way. She instictively wants to please True as if it were wired into her little adolescent brain, "O, I wish I could do something for Uncle True!" (p. 31). Again, later in the text, Gerty tries to make True happy by preparing toast. But, in this instance, she forgets about the toast and it burns, "The tears came into Gerty's eyes;- she looked very much disappointed, but said nothing." She wanted so desperately to do something for nice for True--even something as simple as making toast.
I don't feel Gerty is so different from Anna. I think she would have been shy and reserved just as Anna. Most children that age are reserved; testing the waters if you will. Of course Gerty may have shown a bit of a temper if you mention Nan Grant or her kitten. But, other then that, I don't see her as much different from children now. In fact, I'm glad she's fisty. It makes her believable; not make up like Ellen. There are no children now-a-days like Ellen.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Stowe Prompt
Note: my text references are based of page numbers form the actual novel not the online pdf format.
Uncle Tom's Cabin does seem somewhat of a controversial text, especially based of the perameters we've discussed about 19th century children's literature. I feel it follows some theories while breaking others. Of course, since the book was published in 1852 there will be traces of "typical" format styles related to the 1800's, but Stowe twisted the ideals most peole deemed normal.
On one hand, the novel is didactic in every sense. The overtone of Christianity is evident throughout the book, "Well; but is it true that they have been passing a law forbidding people to give meat and drink to those poor coloured folks that come along? I heard they were talking of some such law, but I didn't think any Christian legislature would pass it!" (p. 74). Even faced with the horror of becoming seperated from his family and leaving the only place he has known as home, Tom insists on remaining purly rooted in his faith, "I'm in the Lord's hands' said Tom; 'nothin' can go no furder than He let's it; and thar's one thing I can thank Him for. It's me that;s sold and going down, and not you nur the chil'en. Here you're safe; what comes will come only on me; and the Lord, He'll help me -I know He will." (p. 88).
The teaching a lesson to the future leaders of America was of grave importance. Authors used the novels to preach to the children. They were taught religion, morality, and even gender roles, "But Lor! who'll ever mend for ye?' and Aunt Chloe, again overcome, laid her head on the box side, and sobbed. 'To think on't! no crittur to do for ye, sick or well! I don't railly think I ought ter be good now!" (p. 91). The thought that Uncle Tom will not have anyone to care for him makes his wife sick. And it's not the idea that there is no one who will help him, it's the idea that it will not be her. Her natural nurturing emotions come into overdrive and she hurts for her husbands wellbeing.
Another aspect of the text that follows the theories of 19th century literature is looking toward the children to uphold a sound and just future, " Oh, Mas'r George, you has everything - larnin', priviledges, readin', writin' - and you'll grow up to be a great, learned, good man, and all the people on the place and your mother and father'll be so proud on ye!" (p. 95).
On the other hand, even though the novel discusses in great lengths the ideals and theories of being a Christian, the character practice quite the opposite. This text which is based on slavery, absolutely contridictes the moral standards of Christians, " 'Don't quote Bible at me that way, Mr. Wilson,' said George, with a flashing eye, 'don't! for my wife is a Christian, and I mean to be, if ever I get to where I can; but to quote Bible to a fellow in my circumstances is enough to make him give it up altogether. I appeal to God Almighty; I'm willing to go with the case to Him, and ask Him if I do wrong to seek my freedom.'" (p. 103).
Uncle Tom's Cabin does seem somewhat of a controversial text, especially based of the perameters we've discussed about 19th century children's literature. I feel it follows some theories while breaking others. Of course, since the book was published in 1852 there will be traces of "typical" format styles related to the 1800's, but Stowe twisted the ideals most peole deemed normal.
On one hand, the novel is didactic in every sense. The overtone of Christianity is evident throughout the book, "Well; but is it true that they have been passing a law forbidding people to give meat and drink to those poor coloured folks that come along? I heard they were talking of some such law, but I didn't think any Christian legislature would pass it!" (p. 74). Even faced with the horror of becoming seperated from his family and leaving the only place he has known as home, Tom insists on remaining purly rooted in his faith, "I'm in the Lord's hands' said Tom; 'nothin' can go no furder than He let's it; and thar's one thing I can thank Him for. It's me that;s sold and going down, and not you nur the chil'en. Here you're safe; what comes will come only on me; and the Lord, He'll help me -I know He will." (p. 88).
The teaching a lesson to the future leaders of America was of grave importance. Authors used the novels to preach to the children. They were taught religion, morality, and even gender roles, "But Lor! who'll ever mend for ye?' and Aunt Chloe, again overcome, laid her head on the box side, and sobbed. 'To think on't! no crittur to do for ye, sick or well! I don't railly think I ought ter be good now!" (p. 91). The thought that Uncle Tom will not have anyone to care for him makes his wife sick. And it's not the idea that there is no one who will help him, it's the idea that it will not be her. Her natural nurturing emotions come into overdrive and she hurts for her husbands wellbeing.
Another aspect of the text that follows the theories of 19th century literature is looking toward the children to uphold a sound and just future, " Oh, Mas'r George, you has everything - larnin', priviledges, readin', writin' - and you'll grow up to be a great, learned, good man, and all the people on the place and your mother and father'll be so proud on ye!" (p. 95).
On the other hand, even though the novel discusses in great lengths the ideals and theories of being a Christian, the character practice quite the opposite. This text which is based on slavery, absolutely contridictes the moral standards of Christians, " 'Don't quote Bible at me that way, Mr. Wilson,' said George, with a flashing eye, 'don't! for my wife is a Christian, and I mean to be, if ever I get to where I can; but to quote Bible to a fellow in my circumstances is enough to make him give it up altogether. I appeal to God Almighty; I'm willing to go with the case to Him, and ask Him if I do wrong to seek my freedom.'" (p. 103).
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The Wide, Wide World Prompt
I am actually glad we are discussing the parents of this novel-in particular, the Captain. All the secondary readings we have discussed emphasized the importance of the family unit. Stay in the country with your family, obey your parents, do chores and learn the importance of hard work...yada yada yada. Know, call me nieve, but doesn't a "family" consist of 2 parents? Unless of course there is divorce, death, ect. I understand traditionally in the 19th century, and even today, gender responsibilities play a key role. But, we only see the back of Mr. Montgomery's head, so to speak. The "parental roles" have been placed soley on Mrs. Montgomery.
Mr. Montgomery is more concerned with trying to get out of the country because of the lawsuit then with his family, "...said he must himself go speedily to France, and that now was her best opportunity; assuring her, however, that his circumstances would not permit him to take Ellen with them...". The Captain doesn't seem too much concerned with the responsibilities of fatherhood. He shows no signs of remorse for the inevitable separation between his daughter and wife.
Mrs. Montgomery on the other hand can not stand the idea of leaving Ellen, "She had at first absolutely refused to leave Ellen, when her husband proposed it; declaring that she would rather stay with her and die than take the chance if recovery with such a cost." Mrs. Montgomery, ultimately, is concerned that she may never she her daughter again. She realizes she could leave for Europe and not come back.
The context of the novel seems to portray the idea that parenting relies on maternal teachings. The father is the bread winner and the mother stays home to raise the children. Now, this theory is typical even today, but not to the extent of this novel. "The breakfast-table was still standing, and her father gone, when Ellen went down stairs..." Gone, gone, gone. He is never there. He can't even escort his daughter, whom he is about to abandon for quite some time, to live with his sister, "No my daughter. I'll not send you alone. But your father says it is impossible for him to take the journey at present..."
In The Wide, Wide World we understand the maternal role is the guiding light. The mother teaches the child to how to act as a proper lady, or gentlemen, manners, obedience, respect, ect. "And if you ever go an hour with a hole in your stocking, or a tear in your dress, or a string off your petticoat, I hope the sight of your work-box will make you blush." It is Mrs. Montgomery's duty as a mother to show Ellen how to conduct herself as a lady.
Ellen knows the different roles her parents have. She never asks for her fathers whereabouts; doesn't ever seemed concerned when he will be home from work; whines if he is gone long hours of the day, "But after breakfast it seemed to Ellen that her father never would go away. He took the newspaper, an uncommon thing for him, and pored over it most perseveringly, while Ellen was in a perfect fidget of impatience."
Mr. Montgomery is more concerned with trying to get out of the country because of the lawsuit then with his family, "...said he must himself go speedily to France, and that now was her best opportunity; assuring her, however, that his circumstances would not permit him to take Ellen with them...". The Captain doesn't seem too much concerned with the responsibilities of fatherhood. He shows no signs of remorse for the inevitable separation between his daughter and wife.
Mrs. Montgomery on the other hand can not stand the idea of leaving Ellen, "She had at first absolutely refused to leave Ellen, when her husband proposed it; declaring that she would rather stay with her and die than take the chance if recovery with such a cost." Mrs. Montgomery, ultimately, is concerned that she may never she her daughter again. She realizes she could leave for Europe and not come back.
The context of the novel seems to portray the idea that parenting relies on maternal teachings. The father is the bread winner and the mother stays home to raise the children. Now, this theory is typical even today, but not to the extent of this novel. "The breakfast-table was still standing, and her father gone, when Ellen went down stairs..." Gone, gone, gone. He is never there. He can't even escort his daughter, whom he is about to abandon for quite some time, to live with his sister, "No my daughter. I'll not send you alone. But your father says it is impossible for him to take the journey at present..."
In The Wide, Wide World we understand the maternal role is the guiding light. The mother teaches the child to how to act as a proper lady, or gentlemen, manners, obedience, respect, ect. "And if you ever go an hour with a hole in your stocking, or a tear in your dress, or a string off your petticoat, I hope the sight of your work-box will make you blush." It is Mrs. Montgomery's duty as a mother to show Ellen how to conduct herself as a lady.
Ellen knows the different roles her parents have. She never asks for her fathers whereabouts; doesn't ever seemed concerned when he will be home from work; whines if he is gone long hours of the day, "But after breakfast it seemed to Ellen that her father never would go away. He took the newspaper, an uncommon thing for him, and pored over it most perseveringly, while Ellen was in a perfect fidget of impatience."
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Construction of Childhood Prompt
I have choosen two ideas of childhood/children from Dependent States and three from Children's Literature for a New Nation, 1820-1860.
One of the three distinct ways children appear in Sanchez-Eppler's study is, "They are forces of socialization: ideas about childhood and the innocent figure of the child evoked in a wide range of cultural and political discourses in attempts to reform, direct, or influence the nation." Adults during the 19th century had a sense of urgency to instill moral and "appropriate" attributes in children. This was partly due to the fact America was faced with an era of turmoil--an identity crisis if you will. We, as a nation, were struggling to find our place in the world. Our Government was corrupt and we were fresh out of the American Revolution. To guarantee a "civil" America we looked to the future, our children
Sanchez-Eppler also mentioned ,on several occasions, the idea of idenifying childhood with dependency rather than age, "...childhood is better understood as a status of idea associated with innocence and dependency than as a specific developmental or biological period." This idea still s puzzles me, but made me think, nonetheless. I feel this rational stems from the idea that at some point in the adult life, you can revert to your childhood. Some sort of circumstance in your adult life will make you remember a moment from your past, be it a happy moment, a sad moment. A situation will occur that will make you reflect. These moments could bring back emotions of dependency that any age can identify with. Age would not be an issue at that moment.
MacLeod implants the idea that 19th century literature was geered towards morality. It was ment to teach a lesson to children. One of the "classic" lessons was that of obedience. "Obedience was the most fundamental virtue for a child to acquire: few stories closed without at least one salute to its importance." he writes. Children must own this quality or all teaching would fail. Children were molded to absorb adult knowledge like sponges.
'"Again and again, the stories tell of children who were "for the most part good," but who were "possessed of one great fault": a mix, in other words, of good and bad; imperfect, but not beyond hope of redemption." You have to belive that no matter what your flaws are you can change. There would be no hope in the world unless people felt this way. We also have to feel it is okay to have a few imperfections. No one is perfect, not even characters in books. We identify with the heroin and the villian.
Selflessness, charity, usefulness, self-control--these character traits were all used to guide children towards contentment. A materialistic child is not a happy child authors would write. "To live "for others," children were often told, was the only sure way to contentment." MacLeod states. This way of thinking also ties into the Christian ideology that was so important to a proper childhood up bringing. It serves as the basis for adults to create the "perfect citizen."
One of the three distinct ways children appear in Sanchez-Eppler's study is, "They are forces of socialization: ideas about childhood and the innocent figure of the child evoked in a wide range of cultural and political discourses in attempts to reform, direct, or influence the nation." Adults during the 19th century had a sense of urgency to instill moral and "appropriate" attributes in children. This was partly due to the fact America was faced with an era of turmoil--an identity crisis if you will. We, as a nation, were struggling to find our place in the world. Our Government was corrupt and we were fresh out of the American Revolution. To guarantee a "civil" America we looked to the future, our children
Sanchez-Eppler also mentioned ,on several occasions, the idea of idenifying childhood with dependency rather than age, "...childhood is better understood as a status of idea associated with innocence and dependency than as a specific developmental or biological period." This idea still s puzzles me, but made me think, nonetheless. I feel this rational stems from the idea that at some point in the adult life, you can revert to your childhood. Some sort of circumstance in your adult life will make you remember a moment from your past, be it a happy moment, a sad moment. A situation will occur that will make you reflect. These moments could bring back emotions of dependency that any age can identify with. Age would not be an issue at that moment.
MacLeod implants the idea that 19th century literature was geered towards morality. It was ment to teach a lesson to children. One of the "classic" lessons was that of obedience. "Obedience was the most fundamental virtue for a child to acquire: few stories closed without at least one salute to its importance." he writes. Children must own this quality or all teaching would fail. Children were molded to absorb adult knowledge like sponges.
'"Again and again, the stories tell of children who were "for the most part good," but who were "possessed of one great fault": a mix, in other words, of good and bad; imperfect, but not beyond hope of redemption." You have to belive that no matter what your flaws are you can change. There would be no hope in the world unless people felt this way. We also have to feel it is okay to have a few imperfections. No one is perfect, not even characters in books. We identify with the heroin and the villian.
Selflessness, charity, usefulness, self-control--these character traits were all used to guide children towards contentment. A materialistic child is not a happy child authors would write. "To live "for others," children were often told, was the only sure way to contentment." MacLeod states. This way of thinking also ties into the Christian ideology that was so important to a proper childhood up bringing. It serves as the basis for adults to create the "perfect citizen."
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Introduction
Hello all...
My name is Jessica Laureano Phillips. I am 28 yrs old and am originally from Savannah, Ga. I am a newly wed...ya! I am also a veteran. I was in the Air Force for over 6yrs as a pharmacy technician. I came to Texas because my husband is from here and I came to TCU because I heard so many great things about the education offered here. I love the campus and am very excited to be here. Right now my major is Business....but I am seriously thinking of switching to a field of Anthropology...go figure. It' s totally at the opposite side of the spectrum...I know, I know, but I'm willing to take a leap of faith!
If I were made Chancellor of TCU I can't say that I'd change anything. So far my experience here has been awesome. Everyone is helpful and nice. In addition, I haven't been on campus long enough to see anything that should be changed. This is my first year at TCU, but I am a junior...or at least untill I find out I need a million classes to catch me up to an Anthropology degree.
If I could have dinner with any 3 people it would have to be President Obama, Tom Hanks, and Truman Capote.
A great teacher, I believe, is someone who makes you feel that they care about your education and are willing to help in any way they can. Also, one who teaches from self experiences and knowledge...and not a book or through lengthy lectures. A great student is one who is willing to learn, dedicate time, and respect those who are willing to teach and those who are willing to be taught.
I choose this course because of an interest I had recently developed about American writers. Since my sudden fondness, I have read many "classic" works and am eager to read more. I have always been one to end the night with a few chapters of a good book...it's sort of a comfort, a nightcap if you will. One of my latest readings was I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou.
And, finally, I have read, understand and agree to the terms of the course syllabus, which I see as a contract to our course.
My name is Jessica Laureano Phillips. I am 28 yrs old and am originally from Savannah, Ga. I am a newly wed...ya! I am also a veteran. I was in the Air Force for over 6yrs as a pharmacy technician. I came to Texas because my husband is from here and I came to TCU because I heard so many great things about the education offered here. I love the campus and am very excited to be here. Right now my major is Business....but I am seriously thinking of switching to a field of Anthropology...go figure. It' s totally at the opposite side of the spectrum...I know, I know, but I'm willing to take a leap of faith!
If I were made Chancellor of TCU I can't say that I'd change anything. So far my experience here has been awesome. Everyone is helpful and nice. In addition, I haven't been on campus long enough to see anything that should be changed. This is my first year at TCU, but I am a junior...or at least untill I find out I need a million classes to catch me up to an Anthropology degree.
If I could have dinner with any 3 people it would have to be President Obama, Tom Hanks, and Truman Capote.
A great teacher, I believe, is someone who makes you feel that they care about your education and are willing to help in any way they can. Also, one who teaches from self experiences and knowledge...and not a book or through lengthy lectures. A great student is one who is willing to learn, dedicate time, and respect those who are willing to teach and those who are willing to be taught.
I choose this course because of an interest I had recently developed about American writers. Since my sudden fondness, I have read many "classic" works and am eager to read more. I have always been one to end the night with a few chapters of a good book...it's sort of a comfort, a nightcap if you will. One of my latest readings was I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou.
And, finally, I have read, understand and agree to the terms of the course syllabus, which I see as a contract to our course.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
